A tech enthusiast and software engineer with over a decade of experience in AI research and digital innovation, passionate about sharing knowledge.
This action by the DNC to block the release regarding its own autopsy report concerning the last presidential race seems shocking yet entirely predictable. Averse to hard truths, the DNC operates more like a publicity machine than a political organization devoted to building grassroots capacities capable of prevailing at the polls.
Unwilling to challenge the party establishment's culture demanding unity, the committee has continued within the influence of the previous administration throughout this past year. Making public such a report could have demonstrated that the leadership truly desire to foster public discourse regarding the strategic failures which allowed Donald Trump to return to the White House. Yet, the DNC is proceeding under the pretense that there's nothing to understand following the stunning loss from the last cycle.
"Here’s our North Star: does this help us win? Should the answer be negative, it is an unnecessary diversion from what truly matters," a justification which was presented to justify concealing the document.
An autopsy report with any value would tackle head-on a series of difficult topics. Among them are:
Choosing secrecy fits a longstanding habit of evading uncomfortable facts. It recalls a situation in which nearly all Democratic officeholder in Washington acquiesced to an incumbent's decision for running for re-election right up until a poor televised debate compelled a change.
At the same time, overwhelming numbers of the electorate were consistently telling surveyors of their opposition to the incumbent to be the nominee.
A thorough report might also probe matters regarding financial allocations, such as how much money were directed to insider consultants as well as ad buyers during a campaign that managed to spend an enormous war chest in a short period.
Ultimately, the secrecy of the official autopsy is symptomatic of an allegiance to the established hierarchy responsible for a disastrous presidential campaign. The implication to ordinary supporters – which includes millions of small donors – appears to be that they cannot be trusted to understand the lessons the leadership have learned based on a report drawing from feedback from all states.
An organization incapable to honestly assess its own failings will struggle to break free from the pattern which was so helpful to their opponents.
A tech enthusiast and software engineer with over a decade of experience in AI research and digital innovation, passionate about sharing knowledge.